Some strategies - for example "Forks" or "Catch up" are considered win-win in theory. But remember that theory and practice in the bookmaker business are often diametrically opposed concepts. The same "catch-up" is a quick way not only to win a million, but also to drain an amount twice as much. 1xbet.com https://1xbet-1x.com/  bookmaker will help you make the right choice

Strategy 1. "Bookmaker fork"
A very popular and by its idea a win-win strategy. Its essence is that the player needs to find bets in different bookmakers and compare them to each other, which will bring profit regardless of their result.

Strategy 2. "Catch up"
Another theoretically win-win strategy. And at the same time the most dangerous for the player. There are many variations in this strategy. But the main feature is the progressive change of the amount of bets depending on the result of the previous game.

That is, we increase the rate until we return all the money with interest. The simplest option is the successive doubling of the amount. First 1 dollar, if we lose - 2, then 4 and so on until the bet is played.

Strategy 3. "Martingale"
A type of progressive strategy, in which the amount of the bet is doubled after a loss, and after a win, it returns to the initial amount. The odds you are betting on must be greater than 2.

The problem of this strategy is the same as that of "dogon", it is not known whether the player has enough money and limits in the bookmaker's office for the required number of iterations.

Strategy 4. "d'alembert"
Initially, the strategy was developed for roulette, its second name is "Pyramid". Here, in case of loss, the size of the bet increases by 1 conditional unit, and in case of a win, it decreases by 1 unit. You set the size of this unit yourself to $10 or $100 if you want.

Again, for "d'alembert" it is better to play at high odds. The strategy is less risky than the usual "catch-up", but in the long run it also leads to losses.

Strategy 5. "Oscar Grind"
Another strategy that came from the casino. This is a typical example of positive progression. The concept is that wins and losses come in periods. Bets are kept low in the losing lane and increased in the winning lane.

It is used for bets on approximately equally likely outcomes, that is, the odds must again be greater than 2. The game is divided into sessions - consecutive bets are made until a profit of 1 bet is made. After the first game won, the bet increases by 1 unit.

The point is that each session ends with 1 unit of profit. With an unlimited bank and time, this strategy will bring profit, but the problem is that it is impossible to predict the number of bets in each session.

Strategy 6. "Kelly Criterion"
The author of this strategy, John Kelly, suggests that players determine the size of the bet depending on the game pot. That is, in case of losses, the rates increase, in case of wins, the opposite is true. The problem is that there is a risk of a situation where the rate according to the formula will be less than the minimum limit in BC.

At the same time, the player must independently determine the probability of the event. And it is incredibly difficult to do it better than bookmakers with their analytical departments and expensive software.